Abstract Introduction: Dental implants have become a popular choice for replacing missing teeth, supported by advancements in implant materials, surgical techniques, and prosthetic innovations. However, implant longevity remains influenced by various factors such as patient health, bone quality, surgical expertise, implant selection, and post-operative maintenance. The aim of this study was to evaluate dentists’ knowledge, interest, and clinical consideration regarding implant longevity and how these factors influence treatment planning and patient communication. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional quantitative survey was conducted among 300 dentists with a minimum of two years of experience in implant-related practice. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire assessing demographics, knowledge, factors affecting implant survival, clinical practices, and continuing education related to implantology. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses, including Chi-square, t-test, analysis of variance, and Spearman correlation, were performed. Results: The results showed that 85% of dentists were aware of the factors affecting implant longevity. However, only 60% of dentists routinely discussed these factors with patients, and 55% had formal training in implantology. The key determinants recognized for implant longevity included patient health, implant type, bone quality, and post-operative care. Statistical tests showed no significant relationship between knowledge or behaviors related to implant longevity and dentists’ age, specialty, or years of practice, indicating uniformity across demographic groups. Conclusion: The findings suggest a stagnation in continuing education and an inconsistent focus on long-term implant outcomes in clinical practice. Strengthening professional training, particularly in long-term maintenance and patient education, could improve implant success rates and overall treatment outcomes.
Gopi et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: