Tuberculosis–diabetes mellitus (TB-DM) is increasingly recognized as a syndemic in which chronic metabolic dysregulation amplifies tuberculosis severity, delays treatment response, and increases relapse and mortality. However, conventional systemic correlates soluble cytokines and bulk whole-blood transcriptomic signatures often appear broadly similar between TB and TB-DM. This highlights a key gap: clinically meaningful immune dysfunction in TB-DM likely resides in specific lung and blood cell states that are poorly resolved by bulk assays. Small extracellular vesicles (EVs) in plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) provide a tractable “liquid biopsy” layer because their RNA and protein cargo can integrate information from infected macrophages, neutrophils, and epithelial/endothelial compartments, and may also include pathogen-derived components. Yet most EV studies remain bulk and cell-agnostic, and interpretation is constrained by heterogeneous vesicle mixtures, selective cargo packaging, and co-isolated non-vesicular contaminants, issues that are especially problematic for nucleic-acid claims without rigorous controls. In this targeted narrative review (2010–2026), we argue that single-cell and multimodal immune reference atlases, including scRNA-seq/CITE-seq, provide a needed scaffold to link EV cargo patterns to specific immune cell states, pathways, and anatomic compartments in TB-DM, enabling prioritized candidates and testable hypotheses. We outline three complementary frameworks: reference-atlas anchoring to project EV cargo modules onto atlas-defined immune states; orthogonal triangulation combining computational inference with immunoaffinity enrichment, targeted validation, and functional assays; and cautious use of “droplet-era” extracellular signals as hypothesis-generating priors for EV-producing states. Implemented in longitudinal, clinically annotated cohorts with standardized EV workflows, atlas-guided EV profiling could yield cell-of-origin–resolved biomarkers of TB-DM immunopathology and treatment response, while prioritizing mechanistically plausible targets for host-directed intervention.
Cioboată et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: