The institutions shaping AI governance are reproducing a pattern older than artificial intelligence itself: whoever writes the rules controls the technology. Drawing on direct experience of IMF and World Bank conditionality in 1990s Uzbekistan, this essay traces the structural mechanisms — rule-making concentration, extraction without representation, epistemic imposition — that make AI governance more difficult to correct than any previous cycle of internationally imposed standards. The Global South is not a geographic category but a structural position: consumption without design, subordination without representation, responsibility without control, sovereignty without material power. Essay 5 of the series Beyond Control: Theory of Limits of AI Governance by Oybek Khodjaev (INVEXI LLC, Tashkent, Uzbekistan). Full text: https://okhodjaev.com/essays/the-colonial-pattern/
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Oybek Khodjaev (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69e866896e0dea528ddeaec3 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19661731
Oybek Khodjaev
Contextual Change (United States)
Contextual Change (United States)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...