This essay reveals how global structures control AI governance, suggesting the need for more equitable frameworks.
The institutions shaping AI governance are reproducing a pattern older than artificial intelligence itself: whoever writes the rules controls the technology. Drawing on direct experience of IMF and World Bank conditionality in 1990s Uzbekistan, this essay traces the structural mechanisms — rule-making concentration, extraction without representation, epistemic imposition — that make AI governance more difficult to correct than any previous cycle of internationally imposed standards. The Global South is not a geographic category but a structural position: consumption without design, subordination without representation, responsibility without control, sovereignty without material power. Essay 5 of the series Beyond Control: Theory of Limits of AI Governance by Oybek Khodjaev (INVEXI LLC, Tashkent, Uzbekistan). Full text: https://okhodjaev.com/essays/the-colonial-pattern/
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oybek Khodjaev (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: