Atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure was associated with an increased risk of death compared to sinus rhythm in RCTs (OR 1.33; 95% CI 1.12-1.59) and observational studies.
Meta-Analysis (n=32,946)
Does atrial fibrillation increase the risk of death in patients with heart failure compared to sinus rhythm?
The presence of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure is associated with a significantly increased risk of mortality compared to those in sinus rhythm.
Effect estimate: OR 1.33 (95% CI 1.12-1.59)
Absolute Event Rate: 46% vs 33%
BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are common, associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and frequently coexist. It is uncertain from published data if the presence of AF in patients with HF is associated with an incremental adverse outcome. The aim of this study was to combine the results of all studies investigating prognosis for patients with HF and AF compared with those in sinus rhythm (SR) to asses the mortality risk associated with this arrhythmia. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched (Biological Abstracts, Current Contents, EMBASE, Medline, Medline In-progress, PubMed and Scopus), to 31 December 2006, using the key words congestive heart failure, heart failure, ventricular dysfunction, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, sinus rhythm, prognosis, outcome, death and hospitalization. Bibliographies of retrieved publications were hand searched. Studies were eligible if they included a HF population and if outcomes were reported by cardiac rhythm (AF or SR). Studies were reviewed by predetermined protocol (including quality assessment). Data were pooled using a random effects model. RESULTS: Twenty studies were included (from 3380 initially identified) representing 32946 patients (10819 deaths). Nine randomized controlled trials (RCT) were included. The prevalence of AF was 15%, crude mortality rates were 46% (AF) and 33% (SR). The odds ratio for death was 1.33 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-1.59) for AF compared with SR. Eleven observational studies were included. The prevalence of AF was 23%, crude mortality rates were 38% (AF) and 25% (SR). The odds ratio for death was 1.57 (95% CI 1.20-2.05) for AF compared with SR. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrates that AF is associated with worse outcomes for patients with HF compared with those with SR. Further research is required to determine whether the adverse outcome associated with AF is related to the arrhythmia itself, or to variables, such as HF severity, patient age and comorbidity.
Wasywich et al. (Thu,) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart failure and atrial fibrillation (n=32,946). Atrial fibrillation vs. Sinus rhythm was evaluated on Death (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.12-1.59). Atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure was associated with an increased risk of death compared to sinus rhythm in RCTs (OR 1.33; 95% CI 1.12-1.59) and observational studies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: