PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 7, 201273 citationsOpen Access

Heart Rate Variability: Measures and Models

MTMalvin C. TeichSLSteven B. LowenBJBradley M. Jost

Key Result

Scale-dependent heart rate variability measures, such as wavelet and spectral measures, are substantially superior to scale-independent measures for discriminating heart-failure patients from normal subjects.

Structured PICO

Do scale-dependent measures of heart rate variability better classify heartbeat records for cardiac dysfunction compared to scale-independent measures?

P
Population
Heartbeat records from normal subjects and patients with cardiac dysfunction, particularly congestive heart failure
I
Intervention
Scale-dependent measures of heart rate variability (e.g., wavelet-transform standard deviation)
C
Comparator
Scale-independent measures of heart rate variability
O
Outcome
Correct classification of heartbeat records as normal or revealing cardiac dysfunctionsurrogate

Scale-dependent measures of heart rate variability, specifically wavelet-transform standard deviation, offer a superior and rapid method for detecting cardiac dysfunction such as congestive heart failure from short heartbeat records.

Limitations

  • The jittered integrate-and-fire model provides a realistic, though not perfect, simulation of real heartbeat sequences.

Abstract

We focus on various measures of the fluctuations of the sequence of intervals between beats of the human heart, and how such fluctuations can be used to assess the presence or likelihood of cardiovascular disease. We examine sixteen such measures and their suitability for correctly classifying heartbeat records of various lengths as normal or revealing the presence of cardiac dysfunction, particularly congestive heart failure. Using receiver-operating-characteristic analysis we demonstrate that scale-dependent measures prove substantially superior to scale-independent ones. The wavelet-transform standard deviation at a scale near 32 heartbeat intervals, and its spectral counterpart near 1/32 cycles/interval, turn out to provide reliable results using heartbeat records just minutes long. We further establish for all subjects that the human heartbeat has an underlying stochastic origin rather than arising from a chaotic attractor. Finally, we develop a mathematical point process that emulates the human heartbeat time series for both normal subjects and heart-failure patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Teich et al. (2012) studied Congestive heart failure. Scale-dependent HRV measures (wavelet and spectral measures) vs. Scale-independent HRV measures was evaluated on Discrimination of heart-failure patients from normal subjects using ROC analysis. Scale-dependent heart rate variability measures, such as wavelet and spectral measures, are substantially superior to scale-independent measures for discriminating heart-failure patients from normal subjects.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a16111b7614f9bab7949463https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470545379.ch6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper