Scale-dependent heart rate variability measures, such as wavelet and spectral measures, are substantially superior to scale-independent measures for discriminating heart-failure patients from normal subjects.
Do scale-dependent measures of heart rate variability better classify heartbeat records for cardiac dysfunction compared to scale-independent measures?
Scale-dependent measures of heart rate variability, specifically wavelet-transform standard deviation, offer a superior and rapid method for detecting cardiac dysfunction such as congestive heart failure from short heartbeat records.
We focus on various measures of the fluctuations of the sequence of intervals between beats of the human heart, and how such fluctuations can be used to assess the presence or likelihood of cardiovascular disease. We examine sixteen such measures and their suitability for correctly classifying heartbeat records of various lengths as normal or revealing the presence of cardiac dysfunction, particularly congestive heart failure. Using receiver-operating-characteristic analysis we demonstrate that scale-dependent measures prove substantially superior to scale-independent ones. The wavelet-transform standard deviation at a scale near 32 heartbeat intervals, and its spectral counterpart near 1/32 cycles/interval, turn out to provide reliable results using heartbeat records just minutes long. We further establish for all subjects that the human heartbeat has an underlying stochastic origin rather than arising from a chaotic attractor. Finally, we develop a mathematical point process that emulates the human heartbeat time series for both normal subjects and heart-failure patients.
Teich et al. (Thu,) conducted a other in Congestive heart failure. Scale-dependent HRV measures (wavelet and spectral measures) vs. Scale-independent HRV measures was evaluated on Discrimination of heart-failure patients from normal subjects using ROC analysis. Scale-dependent heart rate variability measures, such as wavelet and spectral measures, are substantially superior to scale-independent measures for discriminating heart-failure patients from normal subjects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: