PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

Real-world experiences with a multi-cancer detection (MCD) blood test.

View Full Paper
JCJulius Chiang-BoeckmannEWErica T. WarnerAPAparna R. Parikh

Key Result

Among 742 patients undergoing a multi-cancer detection blood test, test positivity was rare (0.3%), and 14 of 16 (88%) subsequent cancer diagnoses occurred after a negative test.

Key Points

  • Assess the effectiveness and outcomes of a multi-cancer detection (MCD) test offered in a clinical setting.
  • Retrospective, observational study of patients undergoing MCD testing from May 2023 to December 2024.
  • Data collected from electronic health records and consultation prior to testing.
  • Participants included those who paid for the test or were part of a demonstration project based on specific eligibility criteria.
  • Out of 742 patients, 4 received a positive cancer signal (0.3%); 2 were true positives.
  • Overall, 16 patients (2.2%) were diagnosed with cancer during follow-up, with some diagnosed after negative MCD results.
  • Notable advanced cancers confirmed were in prostate and breast, indicating limitations of MCD test sensitivity.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=742)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does a multi-cancer detection blood test accurately identify incident cancers in a real-world screening population?

P
Population
742 patients who underwent multi-cancer detection (MCD) testing or were evaluated for a prior positive MCD test at a single clinic between May 2023 and December 2024, median age 59, 92% White.
I
Intervention
Methylation-based multi-cancer detection (MCD) blood test (Galleri; GRAIL)
O
Outcome
Test positivity rate and subsequent cancer diagnosis during follow-up

In a real-world cohort, multi-cancer detection blood test positivity was rare, and multiple cancers were diagnosed within 18 months of a negative test, highlighting limited sensitivity.

Limitations

  • Cohort may be biased by the requirement to either self-pay or carry a specific insurance product
  • Need for larger studies with longer follow-up
  • Small number of positive results

Abstract

10565 Background: Multi-cancer detection (MCD) blood tests hold promise to screen for multiple cancers simultaneously. MCD tests have been assessed in case-control and prospective studies but have not yet been shown to improve cancer outcomes. Mass General Brigham (MGB) offers a commercially available, non-FDA-approved methylation-based MCD test (Galleri; GRAIL) through our Early Detection most were White (92%) and up to date on USPSTF-recommended cancer screening (82%). Med follow up (FU) was 469 days (IQR 462-478); 580 (78%) had > 12 months FU. Four pts received a “cancer signal detected” result (+MCD): 2/742 tested at MGB (0.3%) and 2 who presented to workup +MCD tested elsewhere; 2 were true positives (TP), 2 false positives. In total, 16 pts (2.2%) were diagnosed (dx) with cancer during FU; 2/16 (13%) after +MCD, and 14/16 after negative MCD, with med time from MCD to diagnosis 199 days (IQR 92-464). The two TP tests corresponded to stage I breast cancer and stage III follicular lymphoma. The most common cancers dx were prostate (n = 5, with two stage III-IV dx at 128 and 142 days) and breast (n = 4, all mammogram-detected stage I). Other advanced cancers included stage III cholangiocarcinoma and stage IV adenocarcinoma unknown primary (dx at 515 and 475 days, respectively). Conclusions: In this real-world cohort, MCD test positivity was rare, and multiple cancers were dx within 18 months of a negative MCD, including some advanced cases. In particular, prostate cancer was dx in multiple pts after negative MCD, consistent with prior reports of limited MCD sensitivity for prostate cancer. Our cohort may be biased by the requirement to either self-pay or carry a specific insurance product. Larger studies with longer FU are needed to better define the added utility of MCD tests to standard cancer screening.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chiang-Boeckmann et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Cancer screening (n=742). Multi-cancer detection (MCD) blood test (Galleri) was evaluated on Cancer diagnosis during follow-up. Among 742 patients undergoing a multi-cancer detection blood test, test positivity was rare (0.3%), and 14 of 16 (88%) subsequent cancer diagnoses occurred after a negative test.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192e68fab5b468c441785chttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.10565
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Enterprise-wide implementation of multicancer detection testing across a large academic health system.2026
  2. 2Case Report: Multi-cancer early detection utilizing blood-based genomics: Single-institution case series of novel cancer screening2025 · 1 citations
  3. 3Abstract 3891: Early real-world experience with repeat multi-cancer early detection (MCED) testing2024 · 3 citations
  4. 4Diagnostic Outcomes among Patients with Positive Multi-Cancer Early Detection Test Results2026 · 2 citations
  5. 5Potential and pragmatism: Clinical and public health implications of multi-cancer early detection (MCED) screening via cfDNA in asymptomatic adults.2026