Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Background: An MCED test (Galleri®, GRAIL, LLC, Menlo Park, CA) has been in clinical use since April 2021. We previously reported the results of screening the first ~53, 000 individuals in the US with this test from real-world (RW) practice. Here, we report the RW experience with repeated MCED testing in ~5800 individuals. Methods: This MCED test analyzes targeted methylation in cell-free DNA and uses machine learning to detect a Cancer Signal (CS) and determine its Cancer Signal Origin (CSO). We analyzed results returned through August 2023 for those with a “No Cancer Signal Detected” (NCSD) result in Year 1 and an additional consecutive test. We excluded tests from clinical studies and sites that limited data sharing. Systematic collection of outcomes was attempted for all cases with a “CS detected” (CSD) result and continues via a quality assurance (QA) program. Results: In this RW cohort, a second test was ordered in 5794 individuals (58% male, average age=61. 3 y, range: 24. 0-89. 0 and 42% female, average age=60. 5 y, range: 23. 0-89. 0). Median interval between blood draws was 12. 9 months, and 81% (4693/5794) were tested 10-18 months after the initial test. Among the 5794, 26 received a CSD result in the second test, of which 20 were within 10-18 months, corresponding to a CSD rate (CSDR) of 0. 45% (95% CI 0. 31%-0. 66%; 26/5794). The CSDR was slightly higher in males (0. 50% 0. 32%-0. 81%; 17/3367) vs females (0. 37% 0. 2-0. 7%; 9/2427) and was lower than the Year 1 CSDR of 0. 95% (95% CI 0. 87-1. 0; 510/53, 744). The top CSOs reported during second tests were: Lymphoid, Head anus, head Part 1 (Regular Abstracts) ; 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84 (6Suppl): Abstract nr 3891.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Richard Abrams
Rita Shaknovich
Jordan Lipton
Cancer Research
Menlo School
Illinois College
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Abrams et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e72cd4b6db6435876a634f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2024-3891