Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
A s i thought about the subject of this panel, “the future of the humanities in a fragmented world,” the implications of each word proved elusive. What does “future” mean? What aspect of the humanities? When was the world not “fragmented”? Is that a bad or a good thing? And “world,” of course, could reference anything from planet to Disney (between the two of which there may turn out to be no distinction).
Morrison et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: