PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 26, 2026Journal of the American College of Cardiology336 citations

Outcomes in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction

View Full Paper
GSGrace L. SmithThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Frederick A. Masoudi
Frederick A. MasoudiHeart Failure / Cardiomyopathy
Viola Vaccarino
Viola VaccarinoPreventive Cardiology

Key Result

Preserved ejection fraction in hospitalized heart failure patients was associated with lower 6-month mortality compared to depressed ejection fraction (13% vs 21%; HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26-0.90; p=0.02).

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the six-month clinical outcomes in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction compared to those with depressed ejection fraction.
  • Prospective evaluation of 413 patients hospitalized for heart failure.
  • Comparison of mortality, hospital readmission, and changes in functional status based on ejection fraction.
  • Analysis of risk factors for mortality and readmission using hazard ratios and odds ratios.
  • After six months, 13% of patients with preserved EF died versus 21% with depressed EF (p=0.02).
  • Preserved EF associated with lower risk of death (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26-0.90; p=0.02).
  • No significant differences in readmission risk (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.72-1.43; p=0.96) or functional decline (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.59-1.72; p=0.97).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=413)

Structured PICO

Does preserved ejection fraction compared to depressed ejection fraction affect mortality, readmission, and functional decline in patients hospitalized for heart failure?

P
Population
413 patients hospitalized for heart failure, followed for six months to evaluate outcomes based on ejection fraction.
E
Exposure
Preserved ejection fraction (EF ≥40%)
C
Comparator
Depressed ejection fraction
O
Outcome
Mortality, hospital readmission, and the combined outcome of functional decline or death at six monthshard clinical

Patients hospitalized for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction have lower 6-month mortality but similar rates of readmission and functional decline compared to those with depressed ejection fraction.

Main Result

Hazard Ratio: 0.49 (95% CI 0.26–0.9)

Absolute Event Rate: 13% vs 21%

p-value: p=0.02

Abstract

OBJECTIVES We evaluated the six-month clinical trajectory of patients hospitalized for heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (EF), as the natural history of this condition has not been well established. We compared mortality, hospital readmission, and changes in functional status in patients with preserved versus depressed EF. BACKGROUND Although the poor prognosis of HF with depressed EF has been extensively documented, there are only limited and conflicting data concerning clinical outcomes for patients with preserved EF. METHODS We prospectively evaluated 413 patients hospitalized for HF to determine whether EF >or=40% was an independent predictor of mortality, readmission, and the combined outcome of functional decline or death. RESULTS After six months, 13% of patients with preserved EF died, compared with 21% of patients with depressed EF (p = 0.02). However, the rates of functional decline were similar among those with preserved and depressed EF (30% vs. 23%, respectively; p = 0.14). After adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates, preserved EF was associated with a lower risk of death (hazard ratio HR 0.49, 95% confidence interval CI 0.26 to 0.90; p = 0.02), but there was no difference in the risk of readmission (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.43; p = 0.96) or the odds of functional decline or death (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.72; p = 0.97). CONCLUSIONS Heart failure with preserved EF confers a considerable burden on patients, with the risk of readmission, disability, and symptoms subsequent to hospital discharge, comparable to that of HF patients with depressed EF.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Smith et al. (2003) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=413). Preserved ejection fraction (EF ≥40%) vs. Depressed ejection fraction was evaluated on Mortality (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.90, p=0.02). Preserved ejection fraction in hospitalized heart failure patients was associated with lower 6-month mortality compared to depressed ejection fraction (13% vs 21%; HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26-0.90; p=0.02).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a3e440c7e90e355b84999a7https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00185-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper