Preserved ejection fraction in hospitalized heart failure patients was associated with lower 6-month mortality compared to depressed ejection fraction (13% vs 21%; HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26-0.90; p=0.02).
Cohort (n=413)
Does preserved ejection fraction compared to depressed ejection fraction affect mortality, readmission, and functional decline in patients hospitalized for heart failure?
Patients hospitalized for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction have lower 6-month mortality but similar rates of readmission and functional decline compared to those with depressed ejection fraction.
Hazard Ratio: 0.49 (95% CI 0.26–0.9)
Absolute Event Rate: 13% vs 21%
p-value: p=0.02
OBJECTIVES We evaluated the six-month clinical trajectory of patients hospitalized for heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (EF), as the natural history of this condition has not been well established. We compared mortality, hospital readmission, and changes in functional status in patients with preserved versus depressed EF. BACKGROUND Although the poor prognosis of HF with depressed EF has been extensively documented, there are only limited and conflicting data concerning clinical outcomes for patients with preserved EF. METHODS We prospectively evaluated 413 patients hospitalized for HF to determine whether EF >or=40% was an independent predictor of mortality, readmission, and the combined outcome of functional decline or death. RESULTS After six months, 13% of patients with preserved EF died, compared with 21% of patients with depressed EF (p = 0.02). However, the rates of functional decline were similar among those with preserved and depressed EF (30% vs. 23%, respectively; p = 0.14). After adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates, preserved EF was associated with a lower risk of death (hazard ratio HR 0.49, 95% confidence interval CI 0.26 to 0.90; p = 0.02), but there was no difference in the risk of readmission (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.43; p = 0.96) or the odds of functional decline or death (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.72; p = 0.97). CONCLUSIONS Heart failure with preserved EF confers a considerable burden on patients, with the risk of readmission, disability, and symptoms subsequent to hospital discharge, comparable to that of HF patients with depressed EF.
Smith et al. (Thu,) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=413). Preserved ejection fraction (EF ≥40%) vs. Depressed ejection fraction was evaluated on Mortality (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.90, p=0.02). Preserved ejection fraction in hospitalized heart failure patients was associated with lower 6-month mortality compared to depressed ejection fraction (13% vs 21%; HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26-0.90; p=0.02).