PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 4, 2014Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging64 citationsOpen Access

Differential Effect of 3-Dimensional Color Doppler Echocardiography for the Quantification of Mitral Regurgitation According to the Severity and Characteristics

View Full Paper
JCJaehuk ChoiRHRan HeoGHGeu‐Ru Hong

Key Result

3-dimensional color Doppler echocardiography (3D-PISA) yielded significantly higher mitral regurgitation volumes than 2D-PISA (59.5 vs 52.4 mL; P=0.005), which often underestimated MR severity.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=221)

Structured PICO

Does 3D-color Doppler echocardiography provide more accurate quantification of mitral regurgitation compared to 2D-color Doppler echocardiography in patients with MR?

P
Population
221 patients with mitral regurgitation evaluated to compare 2D- and 3D-color Doppler echocardiography for MR quantification.
E
Exposure
3-dimensional color Doppler echocardiography (3D-PISA) for mitral regurgitation quantification
C
Comparator
2-dimensional color Doppler echocardiography (2D-PISA) for mitral regurgitation quantification
O
Outcome
Quantitative differences in mitral regurgitation volume between 2D- and 3D-PISA methods, and agreement with phase-contrast cardiac MRIsurrogate

3D-PISA is more accurate than 2D-PISA for quantifying mitral regurgitation, particularly in cases with severe, eccentric MR or asymmetrical orifices, where 2D-PISA significantly underestimates severity.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 59.5% vs 52.4%

p-value: p=0.005

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to explore the differential effect of 3-dimensional color Doppler echocardiography for the quantification of mitral regurgitation (MR). Two-dimensional color Doppler echocardiography-based MR quantification has well-documented limitations. METHODS AND RESULTS: We consecutively enrolled 221 patients with MR. Adequate image quality was obtained by 2D- and 3D-color Doppler echocardiography in 211 (95.5%) patients. The quantitative differences between the MR volumes obtained by 2D- and 3D-proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) were analyzed in various MR subgroups. In the validation cohort (n=52), MR volume obtained by 3D-PISA showed a better agreement with phase-contrast cardiac MRI than 2D-PISA (r=0.97 versus 0.84). In all 211 patients, 2D-PISA underestimated the MR volume when compared with 3D-PISA (52.4±19.6 versus 59.5±25.6 mL; P=0.005). A total of 33.3% with severe MR based on 3D-PISA were incorrectly assessed by 2D-PISA as having nonsevere MR. In the subgroup analysis, the MR severity (odds ratio, 6.96; 95% confidence interval, 3.04-15.94; P15 mL) between 2D- and 3D-PISA methods. CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of MR by 3D-PISA method is clinically feasible and more accurate than the current 2D-PISA method. MR quantification by 2D-PISA significantly underestimated MR volume with severe, eccentric MR with an asymmetrical orifice. This article demonstrates that 3D-color Doppler echocardiography could be used as a valuable tool to confirm treatment strategy in patients with significant MR.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Choi et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Mitral regurgitation (n=221). 3-dimensional color Doppler echocardiography (3D-PISA) vs. 2-dimensional color Doppler echocardiography (2D-PISA) was evaluated on Mitral regurgitation volume (p=0.005). 3-dimensional color Doppler echocardiography (3D-PISA) yielded significantly higher mitral regurgitation volumes than 2D-PISA (59.5 vs 52.4 mL; P=0.005), which often underestimated MR severity.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6cff93ce524a4339c2a318https://doi.org/10.1161/circimaging.113.001457
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper