Does incorporating MDCT-derived LVOT area into the continuity equation improve congruence for severe aortic stenosis assessment compared to TTE alone in patients with calcific AS?
Incorporating MDCT-derived LVOT area into the continuity equation improves diagnostic congruence for severe aortic stenosis compared to TTE alone, likely by accounting for the eccentric shape of the LVOT.
BACKGROUND: In patients with aortic stenosis (AS), precise assessment of severity is critical for treatment decisions. Estimation of aortic valve area (AVA) with transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE)-continuity equation (CE) assumes a circular left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT). We evaluated incremental utility of 3D multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) over TTE assessment of AS severity. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 51 patients (age, 81±8 years; 61% men; mean gradient, 42 ± 12 mm Hg) with calcific AS who underwent evaluation for treatment options. TTE parameters included systolic LVOT diameter (D) and continuous and pulsed wave (CW and PW) velocity-time integrals (VTI) through the LVOT and mean transaortic gradient. MDCT parameters included systolic LVOT area, ratio of maximal to minimal LVOT diameter (eccentricity index), and aortic planimetry (AVA(p)). TTE-CE AVA (D(2)×0.786×VTIpw)/VTIcw and dimensionless index (DI) VTIpw/VTIcw were calculated. Corrected AVA was calculated by substituting MDCT LVOT area into CE. The majority (96%) of patients had eccentric LVOT. LVOT area, measured on MDCT, was higher than on TTE (3.84 ± 0.8 cm(2) versus 3.03 ± 0.5 cm(2), P<0.01). TTE-AVA was smaller than AVA(p) and corrected AVA (0.67 ± 0.1cm(2), 0.82 ± 0.3 cm(2), and 0.86 ± 0.3 cm(2), P<0.01). Using TTE measurements alone, 73% of patients had congruence for severe AS (DI ≤0.25 and CE AVA <0.8 cm(2)), which increased to 92% using corrected CE. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with suspected severe AS, incorporation of MDCT-LVOT area into CE improves congruence for AS severity.
O'Brien et al. (2011) studied this question.