Why the study?
Does incorporating MDCT-derived LVOT area into the continuity equation improve congruence for severe aortic stenosis assessment compared to TTE alone in patients with calcific AS?
Does incorporating MDCT-derived LVOT area into the continuity equation improve congruence for severe aortic stenosis assessment compared to TTE alone in patients with calcific AS?
Incorporating MDCT-derived LVOT area into the continuity equation improves diagnostic congruence for severe aortic stenosis compared to TTE alone, likely by accounting for the eccentric shape of the LVOT.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
MDCT-LVOT integration may raise severe AS diagnostic congruence; hypothesis-generating pending prospective outcome validation.
BACKGROUND: In patients with aortic stenosis (AS), precise assessment of severity is critical for treatment decisions. Estimation of aortic valve area (AVA) with transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE)-continuity equation (CE) assumes a circular left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT). We evaluated incremental utility of 3D multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) over TTE assessment of AS severity. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 51 patients (age, 81±8 years; 61% men; mean gradient, 42 ± 12 mm Hg) with calcific AS who underwent evaluation for treatment options. TTE parameters included systolic LVOT diameter (D) and continuous and pulsed wave (CW and PW) velocity-time integrals (VTI) through the LVOT and mean transaortic gradient. MDCT parameters included systolic LVOT area, ratio of maximal to minimal LVOT diameter (eccentricity index), and aortic planimetry (AVA(p)). TTE-CE AVA [(D(2)×0.786×VTIpw)/VTIcw] and dimensionless index (DI) [VTIpw/VTIcw] were calculated. Corrected AVA was calculated by substituting MDCT LVOT area into CE. The majority (96%) of patients had eccentric LVOT. LVOT area, measured on MDCT, was higher than on TTE (3.84 ± 0.8 cm(2) versus 3.03 ± 0.5 cm(2), P<0.01). TTE-AVA was smaller than AVA(p) and corrected AVA (0.67 ± 0.1cm(2), 0.82 ± 0.3 cm(2), and 0.86 ± 0.3 cm(2), P<0.01). Using TTE measurements alone, 73% of patients had congruence for severe AS (DI ≤0.25 and CE AVA <0.8 cm(2)), which increased to 92% using corrected CE. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with suspected severe AS, incorporation of MDCT-LVOT area into CE improves congruence for AS severity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O'Brien et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: