Abstract ABSTRACT: Baran, Lakonishok, and Ofer 1980 present some empirical evidence on the information content of general price-level adjusted (GPL) earnings relative to historical cost (HC) earnings. Their statistical tests are shown to be invalid, thus leaving unsupported their main conclusion-GPL earnings are superior. We apply an appropriate statistical test to their data and find contrasting results: GPL betas exhibit significantly better correlation with market betas than do HC betas for market value-denominated betas, but not for a non-market-denominated β. No conclusion can be rendered on the information content of GPL earnings, and the controversy over accounting β construction is rejoined.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Samuelson et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba43764e9516ffd37a4c30 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-4491877
Bruce Samuelson
Brock Murdoch
California State University, Chico
The Accounting Review
Pepperdine University
California State University, Chico
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...