Abstract ABSTRACT: Baran, Lakonishok, and Ofer 1980 present some empirical evidence on the information content of general price-level adjusted (GPL) earnings relative to historical cost (HC) earnings. Their statistical tests are shown to be invalid, thus leaving unsupported their main conclusion-GPL earnings are superior. We apply an appropriate statistical test to their data and find contrasting results: GPL betas exhibit significantly better correlation with market betas than do HC betas for market value-denominated betas, but not for a non-market-denominated β. No conclusion can be rendered on the information content of GPL earnings, and the controversy over accounting β construction is rejoined.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bruce Samuelson
Brock Murdoch
California State University, Chico
The Accounting Review
Pepperdine University
California State University, Chico
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Samuelson et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba43764e9516ffd37a4c30 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-4491877
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: