PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 7, 2009Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions190 citations

Long‐term health outcome and mortality evaluation after invasive coronary treatment using drug eluting stents with or without the IVUS guidance. Randomized control trial. HOME DES IVUS

View Full Paper
JJJozef JakabčinRŠRadim ŠpačekMBMarian Bystroň

Key Points

  • To assess long-term health outcomes and mortality following invasive coronary treatment with drug eluting stents, focusing on IVUS guidance.
  • Conducted a randomized control trial comparing DES implantation with and without IVUS guidance.

Structured PICO

Does IVUS guidance during DES implantation improve long-term health outcomes and mortality in patients undergoing invasive coronary treatment?

P
Population
Patients undergoing invasive coronary treatment using drug eluting stents
I
Intervention
IVUS guidance during DES implantation
C
Comparator
Standard high-pressure postdilatation
O
Outcome
Long-term health outcome and mortalityhard clinical

IVUS guidance during DES implantation did not show superiority over standard high-pressure postdilatation for long-term outcomes, though significant risks of stent thrombosis after DAPT discontinuation were noted.

Abstract

In our randomized trial we failed to demonstrate the superiority of the IVUS guidance during DES implantation over standard high-pressure postdilatation. However we confirmed worrisome results concerning DES thrombosis after discontinuation of dual antiplatelet-treatment with documented stent thrombosis related events in almost 5% of patients with 50% of mortality in this high-risk clinical scenario.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jakabčin et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ce1c60b9a6e8c528d18574https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.22244
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper