Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Clinical decision-making in oncology is complex, requiring the integration of multimodal data and multidomain expertise. We developed and evaluated an autonomous clinical artificial intelligence (AI) agent leveraging GPT-4 with multimodal precision oncology tools to support personalized clinical decision-making. The system incorporates vision transformers for detecting microsatellite instability and KRAS and BRAF mutations from histopathology slides, MedSAM for radiological image segmentation and web-based search tools such as OncoKB, PubMed and Google. Evaluated on 20 realistic multimodal patient cases, the AI agent autonomously used appropriate tools with 87.5% accuracy, reached correct clinical conclusions in 91.0% of cases and accurately cited relevant oncology guidelines 75.5% of the time. Compared to GPT-4 alone, the integrated AI agent drastically improved decision-making accuracy from 30.3% to 87.2%. These findings demonstrate that integrating language models with precision oncology and search tools substantially enhances clinical accuracy, establishing a robust foundation for deploying AI-driven personalized oncology support systems.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ferber et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d77ce1b843b2be9948ffa3 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-025-00991-6
Dyke Ferber
Heidelberg University
Omar S. M. El Nahhas
Stratasys (Israel)
Georg Wölflein
University of St Andrews
Nature Cancer
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Heidelberg University
Technical University of Munich
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: