Quantum mechanics has lacked an internally consistent ontological framework compatible with Bell's theorem since its formulation. Bell's theorem eliminates local hidden variables, implying that quantum properties are not intrinsic to systems but emerge through relational interaction. We formalize this relational structure through the Relational Coherence Theorem (RCT), which introduces the Affinity Tensor α (S, E) as a measure of quantum coherence built from the off-diagonal elements of the reduced state ρS in the einselected pointer basis, with scalar summary ᾱ (S, E) ∈ 0, 1. The RCT comprises four propositions: property indefiniteness (a nonzero ᾱ precludes any definite pointer-state assignment), relational determination (ᾱ decays exponentially under Markovian dephasing), coherence–affinity correspondence (ᾱ = 1 at the equal-weight pointer-basis superposition, ᾱ = 0 at full pointer-basis decoherence), and conservation of relational potential (under closed-system unitary evolution, local coherence is redistributed into S–E correlations rather than destroyed). Motivated by the RCT, we introduce the Relational Affinity Gate URA (θ), a continuously parameterized two-qubit gate on the Heisenberg-exchange diagonal of the Weyl chamber of SU (4) /SU (2) ⊗SU (2). The novelty is twofold: the RCT conservation law furnishes a conceptual warrant for treating relational coupling as a continuous tunable rather than a fixed entangling primitive, and on superconducting hardware whose Heisenberg-exchange duration scales linearly with θ, the gate-time saving at θ < π/4 yields a measurable per-gate fidelity advantage. Numerical simulations in Qiskit and Cirq compare URA (θ) against CNOT, iSWAP, and CZ under depolarizing, dephasing, and amplitude damping noise models; on hardware with directly calibratable exchange coupling, URA (π/8) outperforms all three fixed gates by ΔF = +0. 019 to +0. 040 at pbase = 0. 10 — an operational expression of the RCT conservation law that suggests utility in near-term quantum devices.
Joshua Adams (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: