What question did this study set out to answer?

The aim is to correct previously published information regarding cost stickiness in construction firms under digital tax administration.

May 22, 2026

Erratum: Digital tax administration and cost stickiness in construction firms: quasi-experimental evidence from China's Golden Tax Phase III

Key Points

The aim is to correct previously published information regarding cost stickiness in construction firms under digital tax administration.
Correction of Figure 2 after initial publication
Review of associated data and implications
Figure correction clarifies misconceptions regarding the data presentation in the original article.

Abstract

It has come to the attention of the publisher that the article Lei X, Ma S, Niu J (2026), “Digital tax administration and cost stickiness in construction firms: quasi-experimental evidence from China's Golden Tax Phase III”. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-11-2025-1849, published with the incorrect version of Figure 2 in which the four labels to the right of zero are shown as negatives.Corrected Figure 2 is provided below:This error was introduced during the article publication process, for which the publisher apologises.

AIに質問

Bookmark