Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
We angiographically calculated left ventricular (LV) filling in 50 patients, all of whom had normal systolic LV function and 21 (42%) of whom had coronary systolic LV function and 21 (42%) of whom had coronary artery disease. Five volume determinations were made: at end systole (ESV), first third (DV 1/3, half (DV 1/2), and second third of diastole (DV 2/3), and at the end of diastole (EDV). To assess different modalities of filling, we calculated filling fractions in the first third (FF 1/3) as the ratio of volume filled in the first third diastole (DV 1/3-ESV) over total diastolic filling (EDV-ESV). Similar filling fractions (FF) were calculated at half (FF 1/2), second third (FF 2/3), and last third (FF 3/3) of diastole. We found significant differences between normal and coronary artery disease patients as follows: FF 1/3: 37.4 +/- 14.9 versus 23.8 +/- 11.9%, respectively (p less than 0.002); FF 1/2: 58.6 +/- 14.7 versus 45.3 +/- 15.1% (p less than 0.005); FF 2/3: 33.8 +/- 15.2 versus 39.0 +/- 10.4% (NS), and differences in the opposite direction in the FF 3/3: 28.8 +/- 15.2 versus 37.2 +/- 11.9% (p less than 0.02), respectively. We conclude that LV filling is accomplished differently in patients with coronary artery disease even if they have normal systolic function.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
SCHABELMAN et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a158cac79ff98d0de4ecc3f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.4960060609
SERGIO E. SCHABELMAN
Louisiana State University
F. Schabelman
Bruce H. Brundage
Cardiac Imaging
Clinical Cardiology
University of California, San Francisco
Louisiana State University
Loma Linda University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: