Left ventricular posterior wall thickness at end diastole strongly correlated with effective diastolic stiffness (r=0.85, P<0.001), independent of left ventricular mass.
Observational (n=24)
Various forms of heart disease (n=24)
Left ventricular posterior wall thickness at end diastole (hp)
Correlation between LV posterior wall thickness (hp) and effective diastolic stiffness (S) — r = 0.85, p=<0.001
Effect estimate: r = 0.85
p-value: p=<0.001
Diastolic properties of the left ventricle (LV) are probably influenced by several factors, including completeness of ventricular relaxation, composition of the ventricular wall, and wall thickness. This study has utilized a combined ultrasonic and hemodynamic technique to examine the influence of LV posterior wall thickness at end diastole (h p ) on LV diastolic characteristics in 24 patients with various forms of heart disease. The slope of late diastolic LV pressure-diameter relations (ΔP/ΔD) was calculated and used as a measure of effective diastolic stiffness (S) late in diastole. S was normalized for average LV pressure during the interval of measurement (P) as S/P, called S N . LV end diastolic pressure (LVEDP), volume index (LVEDVI), and mass index (LVMI) were measured in each patient during the same study at which h p , S and S N were determined. The range of h p was 5.6 to 18.6 mm; it was highest in a patient with aortic stenosis, and lowest in those with mitral stenosis. Linear regression of h p against S, S N and LVEDP showed significant correlation, with r = 0.85, 0.75, and 0.74 respectively ( P < 0.001 for each regression analysis). Poor correlation was noted with LVEDVI, ΔP, and ΔD. Of 12 patients with LV hypertrophy (LVH) by ECG, four had normal h p (7.9 ± 1.0 mm) and eight had abnormal h p (13 ± 0.6 mm). Those with normal h p had nearly normal values for S (3.5 ± 0.5 mm Hg/mm) while those with abnormal h p showed significant increases in S (7.7 ± 1.5 mm Hg/mm), indicating that LVH may alter S only insofar as there is an associated increase in h p . Consistent with this was the observation that within the group of patients having increased LVMI, LVMI itself was a poor predictor of S ( r = 0.50, NS) while h p remained an excellent predictor of S ( r = 0.86, P < 0.001). In summary, this study suggests that wall thickness is an important determinant of left ventricular diastolic stiffness and pressure, and that wall thickness appears to predict diastolic stiffness independent of the presence or absence of LVH or increased LV mass.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
William Grossman
Boston University
Lambert P. McLaurin
Memorial Hospital
Sally Moos
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Circulation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Grossman et al. (Tue,) conducted a observational in Various forms of heart disease (n=24). Left ventricular posterior wall thickness at end diastole (hp) was evaluated on Correlation between LV posterior wall thickness (hp) and effective diastolic stiffness (S) (r = 0.85, p=<0.001). Left ventricular posterior wall thickness at end diastole strongly correlated with effective diastolic stiffness (r=0.85, P<0.001), independent of left ventricular mass.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0eb10a06ecbe833447b40c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.49.1.129
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: