A reproducible non-dipping blood pressure profile was associated with a significantly higher prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy compared to a dipping profile (19% vs 6%, P<0.05).
Cross-Sectional (n=375)
Absolute Event Rate: 19% vs 6%
p-value: p=<0.05
OBJECTIVE: The clinical significance of classifying patients as dippers and non-dippers on the basis of a single period of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) has been questioned. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between nocturnal dipping status, defined on the basis of two periods of ABPM, and cardiac and extracardiac target organ damage in essential hypertension. METHODS: A total of 375 never-treated essential hypertensive patients mean 24-h blood pressure (BP) > or = 125/80 mmHg; mean +/- SD age 45.9 +/- 11.9 years referred for the first time to our outpatient clinic underwent the following procedures: (i) repeated clinic BP measurements; (ii) blood sampling for routine chemistry examinations; (iii) 24-h urine collection for microalbuminuria; (iv) ABPM over two 24-h periods within 4 weeks; (v) echocardiography; and (vi) carotid ultrasonography. RESULTS: A reproducible nocturnal dipping (decrease in BP > 10% from mean daytime BP in both ABPM periods) and non-dipping profile (decrease in BP 134 g/m in men and > 110 g/m in women) was greater in group II (19%) than in group I (6%) (P < 0.05), whereas the differences between groups II and III and between groups I and III did not reach statistical significance. Differences among the three groups in the prevalence of carotid structural alterations (such as carotid plaques or intima-media thickening) were not statistically significant, and microalbuminuria had a similar prevalence in all three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar clinic and 48-h BP values, never-treated hypertensive patients with a persistent non-dipper pattern showed a significantly greater extent of cardiac structural alterations compared with subjects with a reproducible dipping pattern, but not those with a variable BP nocturnal profile. A non-dipping pattern diagnosed on two concordant ABPM periods instead of a single monitoring therefore represents a clinical trait associated with more pronounced cardiac abnormalities. Finally, in non-dipping middle-aged hypertensives, echocardiography appears to provide a more accurate risk stratification than carotid ultrasonography or microalbuminuria.
Cuspidi et al. (Thu,) conducted a cross-sectional in Essential hypertension (n=375). Reproducible non-dipping blood pressure profile vs. Reproducible dipping blood pressure profile was evaluated on Prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy (p=<0.05). A reproducible non-dipping blood pressure profile was associated with a significantly higher prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy compared to a dipping profile (19% vs 6%, P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: