Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
66 Ss were randomly assigned to one of three drug usage assessment conditions: anonymous group-administered questionnaires, anonymous interviews, and interviews in which S‘s name was verified at the outset. No differences appeared in terms of expressed attitudes toward drugs and self-reported use of legal drugs. In spite of promises of confidentiality, however, differences did occur when “illegal” dependent variables were introduced. Since interviewed Ss may substantially minimize their drug-taking activity, much descriptive and experimental drug abuse research may be quite invalid.
Horan et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: