66 Ss were randomly assigned to one of three drug usage assessment conditions: anonymous group-administered questionnaires, anonymous interviews, and interviews in which S‘s name was verified at the outset. No differences appeared in terms of expressed attitudes toward drugs and self-reported use of legal drugs. In spite of promises of confidentiality, however, differences did occur when “illegal” dependent variables were introduced. Since interviewed Ss may substantially minimize their drug-taking activity, much descriptive and experimental drug abuse research may be quite invalid.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Horan et al. (1974) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: