Mental calculation is key to the development of number sense and flexibility in thinking, but in practice, it is often neglected in favour of written algorithms. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between the success in mental calculation and the number of strategies used, as well as to explore differences between age groups and genders. The study included 233 participants from various age groups, and data were collected through a mental calculation test and individual interviews regarding the strategies employed. The study follows quantitative, cross-sectional, correlational-comparative design, and the data was analyzed using key statistical techniques including the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, Pearson’s correlation analysis, linear regression, one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc correction, and two-way ANOVA to examine main effects and interactions. The results showed a statistically significant positive correlation between the number of strategies and success in mental calculation. Differences between age groups were marginally significant; it was found that upper primary and secondary school students used a greater number of strategies. Additionally, boys, on average, applied more strategies than girls. In conclusion, the variety of mental calculation strategies positively correlates with accuracy in mental calculation, and teaching a greater number of strategies may contribute to the development of flexibility and confidence in mathematical thinking. It is recommended that greater emphasis is placed on the development of mental strategies within formal education.
Pjanić et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: