This paper examines constitutionalism and the rule of law in Malawi's post-electoral transitions. The study employs a qualitative approach to assess case studies from recent Malawian electoral cycles, examining legislative changes and court rulings related to elections and their outcomes. Recent constitutional amendments have led to a significant increase in the number of election-related lawsuits filed against incumbent officials, highlighting an active judicial role in upholding the rule of law. The legal system has become more robust in ensuring democratic transitions by countering electoral challenges and reinforcing the integrity of elections. Enhanced training for judges on constitutional provisions affecting election outcomes could further strengthen the judiciary's effectiveness.
Mulenga et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: