Abstract Traditionally, sport science has been framed around two modes of research: basic research, aimed at fundamental understanding, and applied research, focused on consideration of use. Drawing on current debates in the philosophy of science, we identify and articulate problem-oriented sport science as a complementary research mode that seeks to advance both fundamental understanding and consideration of use—in pursuit of a better sport. We examine three contemporary tensions: interdisciplinarity versus disciplinarity; enlightened integration versus superficial aggregation; and value-freeness versus value-ladeness. Finally, we outline four practical consequences of problem-oriented thinking for research practice, higher education, university policy, and the identity of the academic field.
Charbonnet et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: