Identifies problem-oriented sport science’s impact on research practice and education, suggesting a new direction for the field.
Traditionally, sport science has been framed around two modes of research: basic research, aimed at fundamental understanding, and applied research, focused on consideration of use. Drawing on current debates in the philosophy of science, we identify and articulate problem-oriented sport science as a complementary research mode that seeks to advance both fundamental understanding and consideration of use—in pursuit of a better sport. We examine three contemporary tensions: interdisciplinarity versus disciplinarity; enlightened integration versus superficial aggregation; and value-freeness versus value-ladeness. Finally, we outline four practical consequences of problem-oriented thinking for research practice, higher education, university policy, and the identity of the academic field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Charbonnet et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: