Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Moral forms of leadership such as ethical, authentic, and servant leadership have seen a surge of interest in the 21st century. The proliferation of morally based leadership approaches has resulted in theoretical confusion and empirical overlap that mirror substantive concerns within the larger leadership domain. Our integrative review of this literature reveals connections with moral philosophy that provide a useful framework to better differentiate the specific moral content (i.e., deontology, virtue ethics, and consequentialism) that undergirds ethical, authentic, and servant leadership, respectively. Taken together, this integrative review clarifies points of integration and differentiation among moral approaches to leadership and delineates avenues for future research that promise to build complementary rather than redundant knowledge regarding how moral approaches to leadership inform the broader leadership domain.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
G. James Lemoine
Jacobs Institute
Chad A. Hartnell
Georgia State University
Hannes Leroy
Weatherford College
Academy of Management Annals
Erasmus University Rotterdam
University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Georgia State University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lemoine et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d80ada05ee2ba81dbeed42 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0121