October 14, 2014Open Access

Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Carl Moons and colleagues provide a checklist and background explanation for critically appraising and extracting data from systematic reviews of prognostic and diagnostic prediction modelling studies. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

Discussion

Cite this study

Moons et al. (Tue,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69da6664a6045d71bfa3ca2c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001744

Authors

Karel G. M. Moons

Utrecht University

Joris A. H. de Groot

University Medical Center Utrecht

Walter Bouwmeester

Precision Research (United States)

Journals

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología

PLoS Medicine

Actions

Institutions

University of Oxford

University Medical Center Utrecht

References and Citations

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist

Key Points

Abstract

Citation Network

Connected Papers

Discussion

Cite this study

Authors

Journals

Actions

Institutions

References and Citations

Citation Network

Connected Papers

Discussion