Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 14, 2014SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaOpen Access

Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

KMKarel G. M. MoonsJGJoris A. H. de GrootWBWalter Bouwmeester

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Moons et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69da6664a6045d71bfa3ca2chttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001744
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies2007 · 17,910 citations
  2. 2Assessing the Generalizability of Prognostic Information1999 · 1,202 citations
  3. 3The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews2003 · 3,634 citations
  4. 4Comparison of techniques for handling missing covariate data within prognostic modelling studies: a simulation study2010 · 243 citations
  5. 5Evaluation of diagnostic tests when there is no gold standard. A review of methods2007 · 520 citations