This paper defines a system-level evaluation rule for structural admissibility in the Modal-Dependence Calculus. A structure is admissible if and only if every element within it has a defined dependence path terminating at a common core. If even a single element lacks such a path, the entire structure is classified as non-admissible. This establishes a deterministic rule for how structural failure propagates at the system level. Representative configurations are evaluated to show that admissibility does not depend on the size or breadth of a structure, but only on whether all elements are grounded in the same terminating relation.
Austin Jacobs (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: