Evaluation of structural admissibility shows critical dependencies in elements, implying systematic failure methods.
This paper defines a system-level evaluation rule for structural admissibility in the Modal-Dependence Calculus. A structure is admissible if and only if every element within it has a defined dependence path terminating at a common core. If even a single element lacks such a path, the entire structure is classified as non-admissible. This establishes a deterministic rule for how structural failure propagates at the system level. Representative configurations are evaluated to show that admissibility does not depend on the size or breadth of a structure, but only on whether all elements are grounded in the same terminating relation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Austin Jacobs (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: