Electromagnetic flow measurement was highly correlated with direct volume flow collection (r=0.97) in a canine model of aortic stenosis, serving as a reference for Doppler echocardiography validation.
Does Doppler echocardiography accurately measure volume flow through a stenotic aortic valve compared to electromagnetic flow measurement in an experimental canine model?
Effect estimate: r = 0.97
In aortic stenosis, evaluation of aortic valve area by the continuity equation assumes that the volume of flow through the stenotic valve can be measured accurately in the left ventricular outflow tract. To test the accuracy of Doppler volume-flow measurement proximal to a stenotic valve, we developed an open-chest canine model in which the native leaflets were sutured together to create variable degrees of acute aortic stenosis. Left ventricular and aortic pressures were measured with micromanometer-tipped catheters. Volume flow was controlled and varied by directing systemic venous return through a calibrated roller pump and back to the right atrium. Because transaortic volume flow will not equal roller pump output when there is coexisting aortic insufficiency (present in 67% of studies), transaortic flow was measured by electromagnetic flowmeter with the flow probe placed around the proximal descending thoracic aorta, just beyond the ligated arch vessels. In 12 adult, mongrel dogs (mean weight, 25 kg), the mean transaortic pressure gradient ranged from 2 to 74 mm Hg, and transaortic volume flow ranged from 0.9 to 3.2 l/min. In four dogs, electromagnetic flow that was measured distal to the valve was accurate compared with volume flow determined by timed collection of total aortic flow into a graduated cylinder (n = 24, r = 0.97, electromagnetic flow = 0.87 Direct +0.13 l/min). In eight subsequent dogs, electromagnetic flow was compared with transaortic cardiac output measured by Doppler echocardiography in the left ventricular outflow tract as circular cross-sectional area pi(D/2)2 x left ventricular outflow tract velocity-time integral x heart rate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Otto et al. (Mon,) conducted a other in Aortic stenosis (n=12). Doppler echocardiography vs. Electromagnetic flowmeter was evaluated on Accuracy of volume flow measurement (r = 0.97). Electromagnetic flow measurement was highly correlated with direct volume flow collection (r=0.97) in a canine model of aortic stenosis, serving as a reference for Doppler echocardiography validation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: