Do free breathing navigator methods provide similar respiratory motion suppression compared to breath hold approaches in healthy adults undergoing coronary MRI?
Free-breathing navigator methods offer respiratory motion suppression similar to a single breath hold for coronary MRI in healthy adults.
Coronary artery MRI methods utilize breath holds, or diaphragmatic navigators, to compensate for respiratory motion. To increase image quality and navigator (NAV) gating efficiency, slice tracking is used, with more sophisticated affine motion models recently introduced. This study assesses the extent of remaining coronary artery motion in free breathing NAV and single and multi breath hold coronary artery MRI. Additionally, the effect of the NAV gating window size was examined. To visualize and measure the respiratory induced motion, an image containing a coronary artery cross section was acquired at each heartbeat. The amount of residual coronary artery displacement was used as a direct measure for the performance of the respiratory motion correction method. Free breathing studies with motion compensation (slice tracking with 5 mm gating window) had a similar amount of residual motion (0.76+/-0.17 mm) as a single breath hold (0.52+/-0.20 mm) and were superior to multiple breath holds (1.22+/-0.60 mm). Affine NAV methods allowed for larger gating windows ( approximately 10 mm windows) with similar residual motion (0.74+/-0.17 mm). In this healthy adult cohort (N=10), free-breathing NAV methods offered respiratory motion suppression similar to a single breath hold.
Fischer et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: