Transcutaneous range gated Doppler velocimeter measurements of femoral blood flow showed a highly significant correlation with electromagnetic probe measurements (r = 0.96, p < 0.001).
7 dogs undergoing femoral blood flow measurement under basal conditions and intraarterial infusions of noradrenaline and isoprenaline.
Transcutaneous range gated Doppler velocimeter vs Electromagnetic perivascular probe
Correlation between ultrasonic and electromagnetic blood flow measurements — r = 0.96, p=<0.001
Effect estimate: r = 0.96
p-value: p=<0.001
Femoral blood flow (FBF) was measured in seven dogs, simultaneously with both an electromagnetic perivascular probe and a transcutaneous range gated Doppler velocimeter. Measurements were made in basal conditions and during intraarterial infusions of noradrenaline (10 to 400 ng . kg-1 . min-1) and isoprenaline (10 to 400 ng . kg-1 . min-1) thus allowing comparisons of ultrasonic (DBF) and electromagnetic (EMBF) blood flow at 91 different blood flow rates ranging from 5 to 300 cm3 . min-1. The linear regression line through the data of ultrasonic and electromagnetic simultaneous measurement was: DBF = 0.8 + 1.016 EMBF +/- 19.0 cm3 . min-1 with a highly significant correlation (r = 0.96, p less than 0.001) but there was a wide scattering about the mean. Errors in DBF were mainly due to positioning of the probe and determination of arterial diameter.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
M. Chauveau
University of New Caledonia
Bernard Lévy
Vascular Medicine
J.F. Dessanges
Hôpital Cochin
Cardiovascular Research
Maternité Port Royal
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chauveau et al. (Fri,) reported a other. Transcutaneous range gated Doppler velocimeter vs. Electromagnetic perivascular probe was evaluated on Correlation between ultrasonic and electromagnetic blood flow measurements (r = 0.96, p=<0.001). Transcutaneous range gated Doppler velocimeter measurements of femoral blood flow showed a highly significant correlation with electromagnetic probe measurements (r = 0.96, p < 0.001).
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a204fc989a9728653d1edbc — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/19.11.700