What question did this study set out to answer?

This research aims to examine how maternal prenatal stress impacts neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants and the quality of mother-infant interactions.

June 19, 2026Open Access

Maternal prenatal stress and its neuropsychological sequelae in infants and mother–infant dyadic quality: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Key Points

This research aims to examine how maternal prenatal stress impacts neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants and the quality of mother-infant interactions.
Systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA-P guidelines.
Inclusion of cohort and case-control studies with validated chronic prenatal stress assessments in pregnant women.
Analysis using random-effects models in R, assessing risk of bias and evidence certainty.
Anticipated findings will demonstrate significant correlations between chronic maternal prenatal stress and infant neurodevelopmental outcomes.
Statistical evaluations will reveal levels of HPA axis dysregulation as measured by glucocorticoid levels.
Identification of trends in mother-infant dyadic quality related to maternal stress levels.

Abstract

Background Prenatal maternal stress represents a significant public health concern within the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) framework. Unlike transient adaptive stress, chronic prenatal stress triggers sustained hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis dysregulation, elevating maternal glucocorticoid levels and enabling cortisol transfer across the placenta. Reduced placental 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 (11β-HSD2) activity — potentiated by epigenetic silencing of the NR3C1 glucocorticoid receptor gene — amplifies fetal cortisol exposure and disrupts neurodevelopmental programming. Hair cortisol concentration (cHCC), recognised as the gold standard for retrospective assessment of chronic HPA activation, provides an integrated, non-invasive measure applicable to both mothers and neonates. Methods This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. We will search seven electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, LILACS/BVS, and EBSCO Academic Search Ultimate), supplemented by grey literature and citation tracking. Prospective cohort and case-control studies including pregnant women (≥18 years) with validated assessments of chronic prenatal stress — via psychometric instruments (PSS-10, EPDS, STAI, PRAQ-R) or HPA biomarkers (cHCC, salivary/serum cortisol, CAR) — and reporting neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants at 6, 12, or 24 months will be eligible. Risk of bias will be assessed with the ROBINS-E tool. Quantitative synthesis will employ random-effects models (DerSimonian–Laird estimator; Hedges’s g; Fisher’s r-to-z) in R (meta and metafor packages). Statistical heterogeneity, meta-biases (Egger’s test; trim-and-fill), and certainty of evidence (GRADE framework) will be formally evaluated. Registration This protocol is published in Open Research Europe. The formal pre-registration is deposited in OSF (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2Y3RC).

Read Full Paperexternally

AI에게 질문

Bookmark

View Full Paper