Abstract We present a formalism that allows to distinguish between, on the one hand, expectations about future states (agents’ a priori beliefs about those states), and, on the other hand, what will be known and believed by the different agents in those future states ( a posteriori knowledge and belief). We use plausibility models within Dynamic Epistemic Logic (DEL) to model beliefs, expectations and judgments of plausibility. Having such a formalism in place, we can reason about an agent’s false beliefs and false expectations, and when to make belief updates ( relevant announcements) so future undesirable situations may be avoided. A potential application of our framework is human-robot interaction. Based on reasoning about the human’s false expectation, a proactive robot can autonomously decide when and what to announce to help avoiding that the human ends up in an undesirable state.
Bolander et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: