Formalism distinguishes beliefs and expectations in agents to inform proactive decision-making in robots.
We present a formalism that allows to distinguish between, on the one hand, expectations about future states (agents’ a priori beliefs about those states), and, on the other hand, what will be known and believed by the different agents in those future states ( a posteriori knowledge and belief). We use plausibility models within Dynamic Epistemic Logic (DEL) to model beliefs, expectations and judgments of plausibility. Having such a formalism in place, we can reason about an agent’s false beliefs and false expectations, and when to make belief updates ( relevant announcements) so future undesirable situations may be avoided. A potential application of our framework is human-robot interaction. Based on reasoning about the human’s false expectation, a proactive robot can autonomously decide when and what to announce to help avoiding that the human ends up in an undesirable state.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bolander et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: