PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 1997Heart242 citationsOpen Access

Assessing atherosclerotic plaque morphology: comparison of optical coherence tomography and high frequency intravascular ultrasound.

MBMark E. BrezinskiGTGuillermo J. TearneyNWNeil J. Weissman

Key Points

  • To compare optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging for assessing atherosclerotic plaques.
  • Acquired images from 20 sites in five patients using OCT and IVUS on segments of abdominal aorta.
  • OCT operated at a wavelength of 1300 nm; IVUS used a 30 MHz ultrasonic transducer.
  • Tissue microstructure assessed through routine histological processing after imaging.
  • OCT provided superior structural detail in all examined plaques compared to IVUS.
  • Mean axial resolution: OCT = 16 (1), IVUS = 110 (7), significant improvement (p<0.01).
  • Dynamic range for OCT was 109 dB versus 43 dB for IVUS.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: OCT can image plaque microstructure at a level of resolution not previously demonstrated with other imaging techniques because it uses infrared light rather than acoustic waves. OBJECTIVES: To compare optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging of in vitro atherosclerotic plaques. METHODS: Segments of abdominal aorta were obtained immediately before postmortem examination. Images of 20 sites from five patients were acquired with OCT (operating at an optical wavelength of 1300 nm which was delivered to the sample through an optical fibre) and a 30 MHz ultrasonic transducer. After imaging, the microstructure of the tissue was assessed by routine histological processing. RESULTS: OCT yielded superior structural information in all plaques examined. The mean (SEM) axial resolution of OCT and IVUS imaging was 16 (1) and 110 (7), respectively, as determined by the point spread function from a mirror. Furthermore, the dynamic range of OCT was 109 dB compared with 43 dB for IVUS imaging. CONCLUSIONS: OCT represents a promising new technology for intracoronary imaging because of its high resolution, broad dynamic range, and ability to be delivered through intravascular catheters.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Brezinski et al. (1997) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a70ae0baf0c21e93928737chttps://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.77.5.397
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluation of coronary plaques and atherosclerosis using optical coherence tomography2021 · 28 citations
  2. 2Potential of optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in the detection of vulnerable plaques in coronary arteries2022 · 11 citations
  3. 3Role of Optical Coherence Tomography in Coronary Interventions2024
  4. 4Identifying stable coronary plaques with OCT technology2016 · 2 citations
  5. 5A Comparison of Carotid Ultrasound and Coronary Optical Coherence Tomography in Assessing Plaque Morphology in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome2025