Key result
Optical coherence tomography yielded superior structural information compared with 30 MHz IVUS, achieving a mean axial resolution of 16 vs 110 and dynamic range of 109 dB vs 43 dB.
Observational (n=5)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates superior axial resolution and dynamic range with optical coherence tomography compared to ultrasound in human aorta plaques, suggesting high utility for intracoronary imaging.
BACKGROUND: OCT can image plaque microstructure at a level of resolution not previously demonstrated with other imaging techniques because it uses infrared light rather than acoustic waves. OBJECTIVES: To compare optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging of in vitro atherosclerotic plaques. METHODS: Segments of abdominal aorta were obtained immediately before postmortem examination. Images of 20 sites from five patients were acquired with OCT (operating at an optical wavelength of 1300 nm which was delivered to the sample through an optical fibre) and a 30 MHz ultrasonic transducer. After imaging, the microstructure of the tissue was assessed by routine histological processing. RESULTS: OCT yielded superior structural information in all plaques examined. The mean (SEM) axial resolution of OCT and IVUS imaging was 16 (1) and 110 (7), respectively, as determined by the point spread function from a mirror. Furthermore, the dynamic range of OCT was 109 dB compared with 43 dB for IVUS imaging. CONCLUSIONS: OCT represents a promising new technology for intracoronary imaging because of its high resolution, broad dynamic range, and ability to be delivered through intravascular catheters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brezinski et al. (1997) conducted an observational in Atherosclerotic plaques (n=5). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) vs. 30 MHz intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was evaluated on Mean axial resolution. Optical coherence tomography yielded superior structural information compared with 30 MHz IVUS, achieving a mean axial resolution of 16 vs 110 and dynamic range of 109 dB vs 43 dB.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: