Why the study?
Intravascular imaging of vulnerable plaques in vivo has potential for predicting coronary events, prompting a description of the advantages and disadvantages of intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in identifying vulnerable coronary lesions.
Comparison
Intravascular ultrasound vs optical coherence tomography
Design
Review article
Authors
Loading...
May support risk stratification in high-risk patients; leaves open routine adoption pending prospective validation.
Intravascular imaging techniques such as virtual-histology intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography have the potential to identify vulnerable coronary plaques, stratify cardiovascular risk, and assess the effectiveness of drug therapy.
Kochergin et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: