Key result
Pulmonary-artery denervation cuts 2-year clinical worsening ~51% versus medical therapy alone.
Why the trial?
Pulmonary hypertension due to left heart disease is common, worsens prognosis, and has no approved targeted therapy — pulmonary vasodilators have failed or caused harm. PADN-PH-LHD asked whether pulmonary artery denervation can safely improve outcomes in this group.
Does pulmonary-artery denervation added to guideline-directed medical therapy reduce clinical worsening in patients with pulmonary hypertension associated with left heart disease and heart failure?
Population
264 patients with PH due to left heart disease + heart failure (134 vs 130), China
Comparison
Pulmonary-artery denervation + GDMT vs GDMT alone
Design
Multicenter randomized trial (1:1); no sham procedure in the control arm
Follow-up
Median 338 days
Authors
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Experts see pulmonary artery denervation as a provocative new device-based approach for heart failure-related pulmonary hypertension, but flag the lack of a sham control and the absence of significant individual endpoint components as reasons for caution before practice adoption.
Clinicians broadly acknowledge that pulmonary artery denervation reduced clinical worsening in a population with few treatment options, and several call the result exciting. However, enthusiasm is tempered by the open-label design without a sham control and by the observation that no individual component of the composite endpoint reached significance on its own. The central question is whether a sham-controlled trial with hard endpoints will confirm the benefit or reveal a large placebo effect.
Multiple clinicians agree that pulmonary artery denervation reduced clinical worsening compared with guideline-directed medical therapy in this population, representing a notable signal for a condition with significant unmet need.
3 takes classified by contention axis so far — the map appears as more land.
Whether the benefit holds up in a sham-controlled trial with hard endpoints, as several voices note the invasive placebo effect can be powerful. It also remains unclear whether the result applies equally to HFrEF and HFpEF subgroups, and why no individual component of the composite reached significance on its own.
Topol highlights that while the randomized trial showed benefit for the composite, there was no significant reduction of all-cause mortality. He frames the combination of pulmonary hypertension and heart failure as carrying a poor prognosis, underscoring the clinical stakes.
Gulati calls pulmonary artery denervation a provocative new device-based approach for Group 2 PH, noting clinical worsening dropped from roughly 52% to 26% at 2 years with denervation added to GDMT.
Stone, a trial investigator, reports the PADN-HF-PH trial randomized 264 patients with left-heart failure and pulmonary hypertension (mPAP >20 mmHg and PCWP >15 mmHg) at 25 centers to PADN plus GDMT versus GDMT alone, with simultaneous NEJM publication.
Pulmonary-artery denervation halves clinical worsening in PH-LHD; extends interventional options beyond medical therapy in this population.

| Outcome | PADN + GDMT | GDMT alone |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical worsening: death, transplant, HF hospitalisation, outpatient HF worsening, or 6MWD decline | 25.7% | 51.5% |
| 2-year Kaplan-Meier estimates · HR 0.49 (95% CI 0.30-0.82; P=0.006); components not reported | ||
Patient burden
access-site hematoma in 2 vs 1 patients; no other procedural complications reported.
Design limitations
no sham control, the composite includes outpatient worsening and 6-minute-walk decline, which are open to bias in an unblinded comparison, and the trial was funded by the device manufacturer (Pulnovo Medical) and others.
Statistical certainty
median follow-up was only 338 days while the primary result is a 2-year Kaplan-Meier estimate.
Representation
conducted entirely in China, which may limit generalizability.
Does pulmonary-artery denervation added to guideline-directed medical therapy reduce clinical worsening in patients with pulmonary hypertension associated with left heart disease and heart failure?
Hazard Ratio: 0.49 (95% CI 0.3–0.82)
Absolute Event Rate: 25.7% vs 51.5%
p-value: p=0.006
Pulmonary-artery denervation significantly reduced the risk of clinical worsening compared to medical therapy alone in patients with pulmonary hypertension associated with left heart disease and heart failure.
Journal, society, and media accounts. Useful signal, not independent expert judgment.
Zhang et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Pulmonary hypertension associated with left heart disease and heart failure (n=264). Pulmonary-artery denervation vs. Guideline-directed medical therapy alone was evaluated on Clinical worsening (composite of death, heart or lung transplantation, hospitalization for heart failure, outpatient worsening of heart failure, or a decline in the 6-minute walk distance) (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.82, p=0.006). Pulmonary-artery denervation reduced clinical worsening compared to medical therapy alone (25.7% vs 51.5%; HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.30-0.82; P=0.006).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: