Analysis reveals inflammation markers may predict outcomes in head and neck cancer patients on immunotherapy, suggesting personalized approaches.
Most patients with relapsed or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (rmHNSCC) do not experience durable responses to PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors. PD-L1 tissue expression is the most commonly assessed response marker, but an insufficient predictor of treatment outcome. To identify suitable response biomarkers, we profiled the FOCUS trial (Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05075122) cohort for several blood- and tissue-based markers. PD-L1 levels in the tumor or tumor microenvironment were not associated with treatment benefit. In contrast, inflammation-related markers such as IL-6, sCD25, and sTIM-3, as well as high peripheral neutrophils, cell-free DNA levels, and T cell receptor repertoire clonality, were associated with poor clinical outcomes. Patients lacking these high-risk markers performed remarkably well on inhibition of immune checkpoints with pembrolizumab. Biomarker-guided patient selection for pembrolizumab monotherapy or novel combinatorial approaches—potentially including anti-inflammatory agents—for patients with immune-impaired, inflammatory profiles may be the next step in personalizing immunotherapy for these hard-to-treat patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paschold et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: