Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cluster randomized controlled trial shows different WRRs affect physical fitness in adolescents, indicating optimal training methods are needed.
Interval training in school settings has been shown to improve adolescent physical fitness; however, the optimal work-to-rest ratios (WRRs) for maximizing benefits across various fitness components remain unclear. This study aimed to assess the impact of school-based interval jump rope training (IJRT) with three different WRRs on physical fitness in adolescents aged 12 to 14 years and to identify the most effective WRRs. A cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted with 143 adolescents (mean age = 12.8 ± 0.5 years; 72 females) from a middle school in Shenzhen, China. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups based on their class: 30 seconds/30 seconds (G1, N = 48), 30 seconds/45 seconds (G2, N = 47), and 30 seconds/15 seconds (G3, N = 48) WRRs. Each group participated in IJRT three times per week for 8 weeks. Physical fitness parameters, including maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), grip strength, standing long jump, sit-ups, and 50-meter sprint performance, were measured pre- and post-intervention. Between-group differences were analyzed using analysis of covariance. The results demonstrated that the G2 (30 seconds/45 seconds) was more effective than the G1 (30 seconds/30 seconds) and G3 (30 seconds/15 seconds) in enhancing adolescents’ cardiorespiratory endurance and sprint performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: