Cross-sectional study shows strong intra-rater and test-retest reliability of cervical muscle measurements in healthy individuals, suggesting musculoskeletal ultrasound is a reliable assessment tool.
Background: The reliable assessment of cervical muscle morphology is essential for both clinical and research use. However, evidence on the reliability of ultrasound measurements remains limited. Objective: To investigate the intra-rater and test–retest reliability of morphological measurements of the Longus Colli, Sternocleidomastoid, Multifidus Cervicis, and Semispinalis Capitis muscles using musculoskeletal ultrasound. Methods: Cross-sectional area, anteroposterior, and lateral dimensions were assessed using B-mode ultrasound. Anterior neck muscles were scanned in the supine position, while posterior neck muscles were scanned in the prone position. Each muscle was measured three times (to assess intra-rater reliability), which was repeated after 30 min (to assess test–retest reliability). Measurements were also normalized according to BMI and neck circumference. Results: Intra-rater reliability was found to be good to excellent for the Longus Colli (ICC = 0.77–0.92), excellent for the Sternocleidomastoid (ICC = 0.93–0.99), good to excellent for the Semispinalis Capitis (ICC = 0.89–0.97), and moderate to excellent for the Multifidus Cervicis (ICC = 0.69–0.92). Test–retest reliability was found to be moderate to good for the Longus Colli (ICC = 0.73–0.87), good to excellent for the Sternocleidomastoid (ICC = 0.84–0.98), good to excellent for the Semispinalis Capitis (ICC = 0.78–0.95), and good to excellent for the Multifidus Cervicis (ICC = 0.80–0.92). Conclusions: Musculoskeletal ultrasound demonstrates strong reliability for cervical muscle assessment, supporting its clinical use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sidiropoulos et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: