One-group trial shows improved performance in student-athletes, suggesting videos enhance taekwondo training effectiveness.
Taekwondo training must evolve to align with modern competition standards, yet many student-athletes at Sultan Kudarat State University (SKSU) struggle to adapt to new rule changes and techniques. This study developed and evaluated instructional videos as a supplemental training tool to enhance athletes’ physical performance, particularly in speed, strength endurance, strategy, and technique execution. This study employed a one-group pre-test/post-test research design to assess the impact of instructional videos on SKSU Taekwondo student-athletes. A total of 48 athletes participated, undergoing a pre-test assessment before training with the instructional video. After a structured intervention period, a post-test was conducted to measure improvements in performance. The instructional videos were evaluated based on content, instructional quality, presentation, technical quality, appropriateness, and usability. Data analysis utilized descriptive and inferential statistics to determine the significance of performance differences. Findings revealed significantly improved athletes’ speed, strength endurance, strategy, and technical execution after training with the instructional videos. The evaluation of the instructional videos indicated high ratings in content relevance, instructional quality, and usability, confirming their effectiveness as a supplementary training tool. Statistical analysis demonstrated a significant difference in pre-test and post-test scores, validating the impact of the intervention. The study concluded that instructional videos are an effective supplementary tool for enhancing Taekwondo training. Their integration into training programs can bridge gaps in skill development, providing athletes with structured guidance to improve performance in competitive settings. Further research is recommended to explore their long-term effects and application to other sports disciplines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
T et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: