Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis identifies maternal age, employment, and religion as key factors in infibulation prevalence among girls, suggesting targeted public health strategies.
Background: Female genital mutilation (FGM), especially infibulation, is a significant public health issue that poses numerous health risks for young girls. Despite its severity, this phenomenon remains under-documented. Aim: This study aims to identify the factors associated with infibulation among girls who underwent FGM in Guinea. Setting: This study was conducted in Guinea. Method: A secondary analysis of data from the 2018 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) in Guinea included 3950 women whose daughters had undergone female genital mutilation or excision (FGM/E). A multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with infibulation using the Stata software version 17. Results: The overall prevalence of infibulation among girls who underwent female genital mutilation or cutting (FGM/C) in Guinea was 16%. This prevalence was higher at 17% (95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.1–0.2]) among girls aged 0 years to 4 years. Statistically significant individual and contextual factors included: maternal age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4, 95% CI: [1.1–2.6]), maternal employment status (OR = 1.7, 95% CI: [1.3–2.2]), maternal religion (OR = 2.7, 95% CI: [1.2–5.8]), maternal infibulation status (OR = 22.1, 95% CI: [16.6–29.4]) and region of residence (OR = 2.8, 95% CI: [1.6–4.8]). Conclusion: This study highlights the need for educational, socio-economic and public health strategies to eradicate infibulation in Guinea and promote sustainable change. Contribution: This research revealed the influence of individual and contextual factors on infibulation and highlighted the emergency of targeted strategies, such as awareness raising, community dialogue and education about its risks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Keita et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: